Founding Attorney
Disputes over a loved one’s will can be deeply emotional and overwhelming. Whether you’ve noticed irregularities or feel something isn’t right, it’s natural to want answers. Contesting a will is about more than disagreements; it’s about ensuring fairness and protecting the true intentions of the person who passed away. Taking action may feel daunting, but with the right guidance and understanding of the process, you can address your concerns and seek the resolution you deserve.
Reasons for Contesting a Will
Contesting a will is a significant step, often driven by concerns about its validity or fairness. Texas law recognizes specific grounds for challenging a will. Here are the most common reasons:
- Lack of Testamentary Capacity: The person creating the will may not have been of sound mind and unable to understand their decisions or the consequences.
- Undue Influence: Someone may have pressured or manipulated the testator into making decisions that don’t reflect their true wishes.
- Fraud or Forgery: The will could be based on false pretenses, with forged signatures or misleading information.
- Procedural Errors: Texas has strict requirements for signing and witnessing a will. Failing to meet these standards can render it invalid.
Key Evidence to Prove Lack of Capacity
Proving that a testator lacked the mental capacity to create a valid will requires strong, specific evidence. Lack of testamentary capacity means the person was not of sound mind when they made the will, unable to understand the nature of their actions or the consequences. Common evidence includes:
- Medical Records: Documentation of cognitive decline, dementia, or mental illness at the time the will was signed.
- Witness Testimony: Statements from those who observed the testator’s behavior or interacted with them, noting confusion or erratic decisions.
- Historical Documents: Records that show irrational or inconsistent actions, such as impulsive financial decisions or contradictory statements about their estate.
This evidence should demonstrate a pattern of diminished capacity rather than isolated incidents. Compiling a clear and persuasive case can help show that the will does not reflect the testator’s true intentions.
Demonstrating Undue Influence
Undue influence occurs when someone manipulates or pressures a testator into creating a will that doesn’t reflect their true wishes. Proving undue influence requires demonstrating that the testator was overpowered by another’s will. Common forms of evidence include:
- Communication Records: Emails, text messages, or letters that suggest coercion or pressure to change the terms of the will.
- Witness Testimony: Accounts from family, friends, or caregivers who observed suspicious behavior, such as isolation of the testator or changes in their demeanor.
- Financial Records: Documentation of unusual transactions, such as sudden gifts, transfers of assets, or changes to beneficiaries benefiting one individual disproportionately.
Other factors, such as the beneficiary’s close relationship with the testator or their involvement in drafting the will, can also raise concerns. By presenting this evidence, you can demonstrate that the will does not reflect the testator’s true intentions.
Addressing Fraud or Forgery Claims
Fraud or forgery allegations focus on whether a will was created under false pretenses or includes falsified elements, such as a fake signature. Proving fraud requires evidence that the testator was deceived into signing the will or that critical information in the will is untrue. Common types of evidence include:
- Handwriting Analysis: A forensic expert can compare the testator’s known handwriting to the signature on the will to determine authenticity.
- Witness Testimony: Statements from those who were present during the signing can confirm or refute whether the testator signed the will willingly.
- Document Discrepancies: Evidence of altered dates, rewritten provisions, or inconsistencies in the will’s structure.
Carefully gathering and presenting these details can help demonstrate that the will doesn’t reflect the testator’s true intentions.
Procedural Errors and Supporting Evidence
Procedural errors can invalidate a will if it fails to meet Texas’s strict legal requirements. For instance, a will must be signed by the testator and witnessed by at least two competent individuals. If these formalities aren’t properly followed, the will may be considered invalid. Evidence to support claims of procedural errors could include testimony from witnesses who observed the signing or lack of proper documentation proving compliance with the law. Highlighting these mistakes ensures the court examines whether the will was executed correctly.
Contact Our Experienced Texas Will Contest Attorneys
Challenging a will is a complex process, but with the right evidence, you can protect your loved one’s true intentions. If you believe a will is invalid, we’re here to help. Contact the Law Office of Carey Thompson today to discuss your case and explore your options for moving forward.